Opposition to Paul in Jewish Christianity & Paul, Apostle to the Gentiles `

Description: Opposition to Paul in Jewish Christianity FORTREE PRESS 1989, HARDCOVER, 1ST EDITION, 368 PAGES. CONDITION: LIKE NEW. NEAR FINE. NO MARKINGS OF ANY KIND. Paul, Apostle to the GentilesStudies in Chronology FORTRESS PRESS 1984, HARDCOVER, 1ST EDITION, 311 PAGES. CONDITION: NEAR FINE. LIKE NEW. NO MARKINGS OF ANY KIND. Both by GERD LUEDEMANN PAUL,APOSTLE TO THE GENTILES Studies in Chronology1.A critical survey of research into the chronology of Paul : 1.1Introduction ; 1.2 The conventional reconstruction of the chronology of Paul ; 1.3 Various critical objections : 1.3.1 Was Paul a delegate of Antioch and a junior partners of Barnabas before the Jerusalem conference? ; 1.3.2 On the date of the expulsion of the Jews from Rome ; 1.3.3 The indeterminate nature of the chronological concatenation of episodes in Acts ; 1.3.4 Contradictions between Luke's chronological information and data from world history ; 1.3.5the redactional nature of Luke's chronological references : 1.3.5.1Herod and the passion story ; 1.3.5.2 The journey(s) of Jesus and Paul as a stylistic device for Luke's presentation of the propagation of the gospel form Jerusalem to Rome ; 1.3.5.3 A peculiar feature in Luke's use of local traditions ; 1.3.5.4 the chronological and world-historical data as an apologetical stylistic device ; 1.3.5.5Chronological data as an expression of the urbanity of Christianity ;1.3.6 Paul as a historian?. 1.4 The task and the appropriate method :1.4.1 the absolute priority of Paul's own witness for a chronology of Paul ; 1.4.2 the acts of the apostles and its traditions. 1.4.2.1Integration of the tradition of Acts ; Dealing with the chronology of Paul into the chronological framework attained solely on the basis of the letters and the means from identifying and isolating these traditions ; 1.4.2.2 On the question of an itinerary of Paul's journeys 3. Integration of the traditions of Acts into the framework attained solely in the basis of Paul's letters : 3.1 Circumscriptions of the task ; 3.2 The transition in acts from the second to the third missionary journey as the transition in the chronology of Paul from the founding visit to the visit for the collection: Acts 18:18-23 :3.2.1 On the interpretation of Acts 18:18-23 in previous research; The problem ; 3.2.2 Separation of redaction and tradition in Acts18:18-23 ; 3.2.3 Considerations on the history of the traditions in the list of stations in Acts 18:18ff : 3.2.3.1 The trip to Jerusalem in Acts 18:22 as a double of acts 21:15? ; 3.2.3.2 The original location of the visit to Jerusalem in Acts 18:22 : 3.2.3.2.1 Acts22:27ff; 15:1ff; 18:22 as a tripling of Paul's second visit to Jerusalem ; 3.2.3.2.2 The verification of Acts 18:22 as Paul's second trip to Jerusalem on the basis of the chronology developed solely from the letters. 3.2.4 Summarizing considerations. 3.3 On the question of the individual traditions contained in Acts 18:1-17 :3.3.1 The structure and train of thought ; 3.3.2 Questions on the history of traditions in Acts 18:1-17 ; 3.3.3 Comparison of the traditions recovered from Acts 18:1-17 with the chorology obtained solely on the basis of the letters : 3.3.3.1 On the data in Acts 18relevant to absolute chronology : 3.3.3.1.1 The Gallio-inscription ;3.3.3.1.2 Claudius's edict concerning the Jews ; 3.3.3.1.3 Paul's stay in Corinth in the years 41/42 and 51.52 as part of a chronology of Paul? ; 3.3.3.2 The individual traditions in Acts 18:1-17 and their integration into the above chronology : 3.3.3.2.1 Pricilla and Aquila ; 3.3.3.2.2 Crispus ; 3.3.3.2.3 The arrival of Silas and Timothy from Macedonia. 3.4 Acts' explicit chronological references pertaining to Paul's stay in Thessalonica, Corinth, and Ephesus :3.4.1 Thessalonica ; 3.4.2 Corinth -- 3.4.3 Ephesus 5. The eschatological statement in 1 Thess. 4:13-18 and 1 Cor 15:51-52 as Confirmation of Paul's early Macedonian mission : 5.1 Formulation of the question and the method ; 5.2 Exegesis of 1 Thess. 4:13-18 :5.2.1 The situation of the congregation: The occasion for grief :5.2.1.1 Gnosis in Thessalonica ; 5.2.1.2 The relative advantage of the living over the dead ; 5.2.1.3 The inability of the Thessalonians as the cause of grief ; 5.2.1.4 Lack of instruction about the future resurrection of Christians during the founding visit as the cause of grief. 5.2.2 Analysis of 1 Thess 4:13-18 : 5.2.2.1 Context ; 5.2.2.2.Structure ; 5.2.2.3 Exegesis : 5.2.2.3.1 Verses 13-14 ; 5.2.2.3.2Analysis of verses 15-17: The Logos Kyriou and its interpretation by Paul : 5.2.2.3.2.1 Separation of redaction and tradition :5.2.2.3.2.1.1 Internal tensions in the text ; 5.2.2.3.2.1.2 Word statistics. 5.2.2.3.2.2 Analysis of verses 16-17 in terms of form criticism and the history of traditions ; 5.2.2.3.2.3 consequences of the form-critical: Analysis for the meaning of Logos Kyriou in 1Thess 4:15 ; 5.2.2.3.2.4 The meaning of 1 Thess 4:16-17 at the level of the Pauline redaction ; 5.2.2.3.2.5 The Pauline meaning of verse15. 5.2.3 Summary of the results of the exegesis of 1 Thess 4:13-18 ;5.2.4 Implications for the chorological question. 5.3 Exegesis of 1Cor 15:51-52 : 5.3.1 Procedure ; 5.3.2 The proportional relationship of living to dead in 1 Cor 15:51-52 in comparison with 1 Thess4:13-18 : 5.3.2.1 1 Cor 15:51-52 as the continuation of 1 Thess4:13-18 ; 5.3.2.2 Survival as the exception. 5.3.3 The description of the resurrection in 1 Cor 15:51-52 in comparison with 1 Thess 4:13-18: 5.3.3.1 the image of transformation in 1 Cor 15:51-52 ; 5.3.3.2Comparison of the descriptions of the resurrection in 1 Cor 15:51-52and 1 Thess 4:13-18 ; 5.3.4 On the occasion and rationale of Paul's view of the resurrection in 1 Cor 15:51-52 ; 5.3.5 Implications for the chronology 7. Bibliography : 7.1 Sources ; 7.2 Commentaries ; 7.3Secondary literature.

Price: 40 USD

Location: Van Nuys, California

End Time: 2024-11-29T17:00:01.000Z

Shipping Cost: 5 USD